· Marcus Lin · Engineering  · 6 min read

Rogers RO4350B vs Megtron 6

A direct comparison of Rogers RO4350B and Panasonic Megtron 6 for RF, 5G, and high-speed digital applications. Dk, Df, processability, cost, and when to choose each.

A direct comparison of Rogers RO4350B and Panasonic Megtron 6 for RF, 5G, and high-speed digital applications. Dk, Df, processability, cost, and when to choose each.

Quick Answer

RO4350B wins on pure RF performance (lower Dk/Df) for applications below 20 GHz, while Megtron 6 wins on processability, cost, and multilayer capability for mixed-signal boards above 12 layers.

30-Second Decision

ParameterRO4350BMegtron 6Winner
Dk @10 GHz3.483.71RO4350B
Df @10 GHz0.00370.0044RO4350B
Tg280C+200CRO4350B
CTE (z-axis)32 ppm/C45 ppm/CRO4350B
Standard process compatibleMostlyFullyMegtron 6
Max practical layer count8-10L30L+Megtron 6
Cost vs FR-43-5x1.5-2xMegtron 6
Lead time3-4 weeks2-3 weeksMegtron 6

Bottom line: If your design is a dedicated RF front-end (antenna feed, LNA, filter) at 2-20 GHz with fewer than 10 layers, choose RO4350B. If you need a high-layer-count mixed-signal board with both high-speed digital (PCIe Gen5, 112G SerDes) and moderate RF performance, choose Megtron 6.


Electrical Performance: The Numbers That Matter

Dielectric Constant (Dk) Stability

RO4350B maintains Dk within +/-0.05 from 1 to 40 GHz. Megtron 6 shows more variation above 20 GHz, with Dk drift of +/-0.08. For impedance-controlled designs where tight tolerance matters (antenna matching networks, filter tuning), this stability directly affects yield.

Practical impact: A 50-ohm microstrip on RO4350B stays within +/-2 ohms across a 10 GHz bandwidth. The same trace on Megtron 6 may vary +/-4 ohms — acceptable for digital, problematic for RF.

Loss Tangent (Df) and Insertion Loss

At 10 GHz over a 100mm trace:

  • RO4350B: 0.28 dB insertion loss
  • Megtron 6: 0.34 dB insertion loss
  • Standard FR-4 (Dk ~4.4, Df ~0.02): 1.5 dB insertion loss

The 0.06 dB difference between RO4350B and Megtron 6 becomes significant in:

  • Phased array feeds with 16+ elements (cumulative loss budget)
  • Multi-stage filter designs where every 0.1 dB matters
  • Long backplane channels above 25 Gbps NRZ

For PCIe Gen5 (32 GT/s) over 200mm, both materials deliver adequate eye opening. The difference only surfaces at 112G PAM4 channel lengths above 150mm.

RO4350B vs Megtron 6 comparison chart


Fabrication and Processability

This is where Megtron 6 pulls ahead decisively.

Drilling

ParameterRO4350BMegtron 6
Mechanical drill min0.2mm (standard)0.15mm
Laser drill compatibleYes (with tuning)Yes (standard params)
Drill wear rateHigher (ceramic filler)Normal
Hole wall qualityGood (needs deburr)Excellent

RO4350B contains ceramic filler that accelerates drill bit wear. Production runs above 500 panels require more frequent bit changes, adding 5-10% to drilling cost.

Lamination

RO4350B requires:

  • Specific bonding films (RO4450F or low-flow prepregs)
  • Tighter temperature ramps (2C/min vs 3-4C/min standard)
  • Not all fab shops have qualified RO4350B processes

Megtron 6 laminates with standard FR-4 prepregs and press cycles. Any shop running high-Tg FR-4 can process Megtron 6 without qualification.

RF PCB EXPERTISE

Not Sure Which Material Fits Your Design?

Our engineers work with both RO4350B and Megtron 6 daily. Upload your stackup for a material recommendation based on your actual frequency plan.

Get Material Recommendation ›

Hybrid Stackup: Using Both Materials Together

For complex systems (phased array radar, 5G base station), the optimal approach is often a hybrid stackup:

  • RF layers (antenna/feed): RO4350B cores for antenna elements and RF signal routing
  • Digital layers (FPGA, SerDes): Megtron 6 for high-speed digital interconnects
  • Power layers: Standard high-Tg FR-4 (cost optimization)

Hybrid stackup example (10-layer):

L1  — RO4350B — Antenna/RF signals
L2  — GND (reference)
L3  — Megtron 6 — High-speed digital
L4  — GND
L5  — FR-4 — Power
L6  — FR-4 — Power  
L7  — GND
L8  — Megtron 6 — High-speed digital
L9  — GND (reference)
L10 — RO4350B — RF signals

Challenges of hybrid:

  • CTE mismatch between materials creates stress during thermal cycling
  • Requires qualification of bonding film between dissimilar materials
  • Limited to shops experienced with mixed-dielectric builds
  • Add 20-30% to cost vs single-material stackup

AtlasPCB regularly fabricates hybrid Rogers/FR-4 stackups with controlled CTE transitions.

MIXED-DIELECTRIC BUILDS

Hybrid Stackup? We Build Them Weekly.

Rogers + Megtron + FR-4 in a single board. Our lamination team has qualified 40+ hybrid material combinations.

View RF Capabilities ›

Application Decision Matrix

ApplicationRecommendedReason
77 GHz automotive radarRO4350B (or RO3003)Loss budget too tight for Megtron 6
5G sub-6 GHz massive MIMOMegtron 620+ layers, standard processing, adequate loss
28 GHz mmWave small cellRO4350B (RF) + Megtron 6 (digital)Hybrid approach
400G switch/router backplaneMegtron 6 (or Megtron 7)Layer count > 20, standard flow
Satellite L/S band transponderRO4350BThermal reliability, low outgassing
PCIe Gen5 server boardMegtron 6Cost-effective, 16-24 layers
Phased array antenna elementRO4350BDk stability for beam steering accuracy
Test & measurement (VNA cal board)RO4350BTightest Dk tolerance available

PROTOTYPE FAST-TRACK

Rogers and Megtron In Stock

We stock RO4350B (20/30/60mil) and Megtron 6 cores. Prototype in 7-10 days for RF boards.

Upload Gerber Files ›

Cost Comparison: Real-World Pricing

For a typical 6-layer, 100x100mm, 10-piece prototype run:

MaterialPanel Cost (approx.)Lead Time
Standard FR-4 (Tg170)$180-2505-7 days
Megtron 6$320-45010-14 days
RO4350B (all layers)$650-90014-21 days
Hybrid RO4350B + FR-4$450-65012-18 days

Volume pricing at 1000 pcs (same board):

  • Standard FR-4: $8-12/board
  • Megtron 6: $14-22/board
  • RO4350B: $28-45/board

The 2-3x premium for Rogers only makes sense when electrical performance requirements genuinely demand it. Many designers over-specify material — using RO4350B where Megtron 6 suffices wastes 40-60% of material budget.


Standards and Specifications

StandardRelevance
IPC-4103Specification for Rogers-type materials (thermoset microwave)
IPC-4101/126Megtron 6 equivalent high-speed digital laminate
IPC-6012ESSpace/military addendum (relevant for RO4350B applications)
MIL-PRF-31032Qualified product list — check if your Rogers variant is listed

ATLASPCB

Ready to Compare Quotes?

Upload your design — we quote both RO4350B and Megtron 6 options so you can compare cost vs performance with real numbers.

Get Dual-Material Quote ›

Related Reading:

About AtlasPCB — We specialize in complex PCB manufacturing for HDI, RF, and high-reliability applications. Explore our RF and high-frequency PCB services, Rogers RO4350B PCB manufacturing, or get an Megtron 6 & 7 low-loss PCB manufacturing . Every order includes free engineering review. Get your quote.

Reviewed by AtlasPCB Engineering Team — IPC-certified manufacturing specialists with 15+ years of production experience in HDI, RF, and high-reliability PCB fabrication. Content based on factory floor data and real customer design reviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Megtron 6 instead of Rogers for 5G mmWave designs?
For frequencies below 15 GHz, Megtron 6 performs adequately with Df of 0.0044 at 10 GHz. Above 28 GHz, Rogers RO4350B or RO3003 provides significantly lower insertion loss.
Is RO4350B compatible with standard FR-4 fabrication processes?
Partially. RO4350B uses thermoset resin (not PTFE) so it can be drilled and plated conventionally, but it requires special lamination parameters and compatible prepregs like RO4450F.
What is the cost difference between RO4350B and Megtron 6?
RO4350B typically costs 3-5x standard FR-4, while Megtron 6 runs 1.5-2x FR-4. For a 6-layer board, this translates to roughly 2-3x price difference per panel.
Which material has better thermal reliability for automotive radar?
RO4350B with Tg above 280C and CTE z-axis of 32 ppm/C outperforms Megtron 6 (Tg 200C, CTE z-axis 45 ppm/C) for high-temperature automotive environments.
  • pcb-materials
  • rf-pcb
  • high-frequency
  • rogers
  • megtron
Share:

Related Posts

View All Posts »
FR-4 vs Rogers PCB: Fr4 Material

FR-4 vs Rogers PCB: Fr4 Material

FR-4 or Rogers? Compare dielectric loss, thermal stability, cost, and fabrication compatibility to choose the right PCB material for your frequency range and budget constraints.

RF PCB Cost Breakdown: Rogers Ptfe

RF PCB Cost Breakdown: Rogers Ptfe

Understand what drives RF PCB manufacturing costs. Compare Rogers RO4350B, RO4003C, PTFE, and FR-4 hybrid stackup pricing with real cost multipliers, optimization strategies, and quotes.

Rogers PCB Material Guide

Rogers PCB Material Guide

Complete overview of Rogers PCB materials including RO4000, RO3000, RT/duroid series. Compare Dk, Df properties, application ranges from 5G mmWave to automotive radar, and learn what to look for in a Rogers PCB manufacturer.

Rogers RO4350B vs PTFE for RF PCB

Rogers RO4350B vs PTFE for RF PCB

Choosing between Rogers RO4350B and PTFE for your RF PCB? Compare dielectric properties, thermal reliability, fabrication compatibility, and cost to make the right material decision for your frequency range.